/Parent 11 0 R 277 0 obj /S /H2 /Lang (EN-US) /Lang (EN-US) << << /StructParents 24 /K 2 /Parent 10 0 R endobj /P 12 0 R /P 12 0 R endobj For the reasons stated below, Petitioner's Motion to Disqualify Counsel . /Pg 37 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /Lang (EN-US) /Parent 6 0 R >> 151 0 obj /Contents [396 0 R 397 0 R 398 0 R] /Parent 6 0 R 191 0 obj 263 0 obj 118 0 obj /Pg 41 0 R /Pg 15 0 R 99 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) /K 12 >> 0000009504 00000 n /K 1 the matters involved in both representations are substantially related, and. endobj << /S /P 236 0 obj 00021 Motion to Strike Defendant BRIAN FROST's Affirmative Defenses. /P 284 0 R 72 0 obj /Pg 18 0 R /Pg 15 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /K 11 >> /Tabs /S >> /Pg 45 0 R /P 531 0 R << >> /Pg 16 0 R 86 0 obj The law with respect to disqualification varies depending on the conflict relation and the poten-tially harmed party. 0000004058 00000 n These motions are becoming ever more common. 180 0 obj 23 [152 0 R 153 0 R 154 0 R 155 0 R] /Pg 16 0 R /S /P /P 508 0 R << /K 33 >> ECF No. /P 12 0 R /Pg 22 0 R << /K 4 >> /S /H1 endobj hb```c``X8c*}"3=O62ke'\9(8b 306 0 obj >> 298 0 obj stream endobj An official website of the United States government. It is only appropriate to disqualify an attorney due to her status as a potential witness if the attorney's testimony is /P 509 0 R /K 28 << A motion is a document asking the court to order something in an existing case. /Lang (EN-US) >> 89 0 obj 175 0 obj 173 0 obj 208 0 obj /Pg 15 0 R endobj motion to disqualify. /Pg 16 0 R /Pg 15 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /Lang (EN-US) /S /P /P 12 0 R >> /S /P /Pg 27 0 R 220 0 obj << /P 55 0 R >> Response to Motion to Disqualify, 8/14/17, at 10. << >> endobj >> /Pg 20 0 R endobj /Lang (EN-US) /Pg 16 0 R >> endobj << /S /Reference endobj After this hearing, M retained counsel (C.H.). /K 16 /K 4 182 0 obj /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /K 0 /P 506 0 R /Pg 15 0 R /K 4 /P 509 0 R /P 12 0 R When it's warranted, a motion to disqualify the opposing counsel can be a potent weapon. /Resources 371 0 R /P 55 0 R >> /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] endobj In 3/19, C.H. Conflict violations are not always the focal point for resolution of a motion to disqualify. Among our firm's growing practice areas is litigation where one party files a motion seeking to disqualify another party's lawyers. endobj First, identify and resolve potential conflicts, including both multiple and successive representations, before undertaking a representation or hiring a lateral. 80 0 obj /Pg 20 0 R /K [18 283 0 R 20] /Resources 466 0 R 256 0 obj << /S /Reference endobj /Lang (EN-US) /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] << >> /S /P An important requirement contained in rule 2.160 (e) is that a disqualification motion must be made within 10 days after the "discovery of the facts constituting the grounds" for the motion. << << endobj /Lang (EN-US) /Lang (EN-US) endobj 127 0 obj by plaintiff Plaintiffs motion is unsupported by any applicable legal authority and is not . >> /Pg 17 0 R /Length 533 0 R /S /P /Type /Page /K 21 Frosh, Attorney General of Maryland, and Carrie J. Williams, Assistant Attorney General, pursuant to this Court's October 12, 2022 order, hereby responds to Mr. Syed's motion to disqualify the Office of the Attorney General as counsel for the State of Maryland or strike the State as a party to the appeal and states as follows: I. >> /K 1 129 0 obj << endobj >> /K 19 245 0 obj The defendant's demand is presently under consideration by the Justice Department. 238 0 obj /Pg 21 0 R /P 162 0 R /S /P /S /P << << endobj << /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /K [8 510 0 R] /Lang (EN-US) /P 280 0 R 281 0 obj Increasingly, courts nationwide have recognized and accepted timely, effective ethics screens as a positive factor for permitting an attorney to continue the representation, although sometimes a screen is not enough to avoid the ramifications of an imputed conflict.12 Nonetheless, if the attorneys choose to employ a screen, it is important that it be erected before the involvement of the conflicted attorney in the new representation.13. /P 528 0 R 171 0 obj endobj /P 12 0 R /Tabs /S /Lang (EN-US) << >> /Parent 3 0 R Depending on the circumstances, a law firm may also consider reporting the motion to its legal malpractice insurer, as a motion to disqualify may be a precursor to a bar grievance or a legal malpractice claim. /S /P /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /S /P >> /K 0 /Lang (EN-US) endobj /K 42 Moreover, other witnesses are available to testify about the contested facts on which the defendant's Motion is based. 25 [158 0 R 159 0 R] /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] endobj /K 17 1, WSBA Public Information on Mary Ann Strickler). Subscribe to Justia's Free Newsletters featuring summaries of federal and state court opinions. /K [34 291 0 R 36] /StructParents 21 /Pg 15 0 R >> << >> 0000009358 00000 n With respect to the events that occurred during the prosecutors' meeting with the defendant, it is not essential that the prosecuting attorneys testify at trial. Brown v. Encompass Ins. 22 0 obj 125 0 obj /Pg 19 0 R /S /P endobj << In recent months, a number of high-profile disqualification motions have been reported. << << << 14-CV-01885-RM-BNB, 2014 WL 7177378 at *2 (D.Colo. /Pg 16 0 R /Pg 34 0 R 438 0 obj /P 12 0 R /S /P /P 298 0 R endobj /Pg 22 0 R 104 0 obj /P 506 0 R 0000001974 00000 n /S /P /Annots [] 0000008829 00000 n /S /P /Lang (EN-US) The defendant may not call the prosecutors as witnesses unless there is a compelling need to do so. /S /Reference /S /TOCI /K 5 /S /P endobj endobj /S /Reference 36 0 obj RESPONSE TO ORDER REGARDING APPOINTMENT, MOTION TO DISQUALIFY PRESIDING OFFICER, AND MOTION FOR A STAY PENDING RESOLUTION OF THE MOTION TO DISQUALIFY I, Adam C. Sloane, hereby state that: 1. /S /P /P 12 0 R /P 310 0 R /Pg 44 0 R /P 12 0 R /K 17 /Pg 27 0 R << /Pg 29 0 R /Count 5 /K [10 527 0 R] /Lang (EN-US) /Pg 20 0 R ,"w0:IYbJ!`.^OtX]8Xhyi(< 1+!)CafX>2p1D0UXrA!iP2j\ /A 499 0 R 60 0 obj /S /P /P 508 0 R /Annots [] >> /Pg 27 0 R /S /P << /S /TOCI 3. endobj endobj The two motions to disqualify have been opposed; the motion to strike is unopposed. /Lang (EN-US) /P 12 0 R Defendant Brian Frost submits this response in opposition to the Motion to Disqualify filed. 37 0 obj /Pg 35 0 R /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /K [42 295 0 R 44] << 309 0 R 308 0 R null 310 0 R 311 0 R 310 0 R null 312 0 R null 57 0 R] /S /P >> >> /S /P << 290 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) 0000006588 00000 n << /P 55 0 R endobj /K 8 /S /P /Type /Page << /S /P /P 509 0 R endobj /Pg 46 0 R /Pg 25 0 R /K 1 << Instead, Colo. RPC 1.9(a) provides that, [a] lawyer who has formerly represented a client in a matter shall not thereafter represent another person in the same or a substantially related matter in which that persons interests are materially adverse to the interests of the former client unless the former client gives informed consent, confirmed in writing. endobj /S /P /S /P >> See Fed. /Resources 490 0 R /K [13 311 0 R 15] RESPONSE TO SOME SPECIFIC CLAIMS OF IMPROPRIETY IN THE MOTION TO DISQUALIFY (1) THE CLAIM: Special Counsel breached confidentiality by allowing a DMS employee to be present for sworn testimony of numerous witnesses. /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] Introduction /S /P /Lang (EN-US) /Lang (EN-US) endobj /P 55 0 R << This is often referred to as playbook knowledgethe attorney knows the clients paths and approaches. /Contents [429 0 R 430 0 R 431 0 R] >> 50 0 obj at 390-91. 27 0 obj /StructParents 12 /K 23 /P 12 0 R endobj /StructParents 2 << /Lang (EN-US) 55 0 obj /RoleMap 14 0 R /Tabs /S /Rotate 0 /Lang (EN-US) 276 0 obj Mr. /Lang (EN-US) /K 2 /S /P endobj 20 [142 0 R 143 0 R] /Lang (EN-US) /S /Reference /K 7 /Pg 16 0 R /S /P << /Pg 44 0 R 110 0 obj /CropBox [0 0 612 792] northwoods educational foundation, inc.'s reply to plaintiff's response to motion to disqualify and response to motion for sanctions /Lang (EN-US) 74 0 obj /S /P All Responses to Motions and Answers to Petitions must be filed with the Office of Judicial Records and submitted to the Motion Clerk on or before the Response Date. 33 [184 0 R 185 0 R 186 0 R 187 0 R 188 0 R 332 0 R 333 0 R 334 0 R 335 0 R 336 0 R 103 0 obj /Pg 30 0 R /K 0 /K [322 0 R 324 0 R] 228 0 obj /K 9 /Pg 22 0 R >> endobj /K 8 endobj /P 12 0 R /K 0 172 0 obj /P 507 0 R >> << /K 4 /Pg 29 0 R /K 13 302 0 R null] Thus, there is no bright-line rule or test to determine whether an attorney should be disqualified because of her or his playbook knowledge. ANSWER or RESPONSE DATE. /Pg 27 0 R >> >> /Type /Page /K 0 Official websites use .gov /S /P 14 [123 0 R 125 0 R 126 0 R null 315 0 R 316 0 R 315 0 R null 317 0 R null >> >> HWYoF~G-I\#3 -*;Y^4N&GS/^N'jp09AYr3AG8Qw&ci`UyaFGjQ`H >pt$jxGON@QN]K+t(+|Z6*/@I f%4@Pygv,)23 j8[-h5y$#,Y+9Z2!CK >O6H)jF}ZA|k>&dn[1*.~.>u50,@Wt?fOG# i?k@;)d1GfzN]^;{f"U}2`%dC!5}| _Phf"HjjIzj[NC >> /Pg 45 0 R << endobj endobj << endstream >> 137 0 obj /P 12 0 R /S /P /S /TOCI Colo. RPC 1.9 does not define a substantially related matter,. /Lang (EN-US) /Lang (EN-US) !location.countrycode?location.countryName :location.officeName }}, {{ getActiveCase(headerData.languageLinks,'active',true).languageCode | uppercase}}, {{ getActiveCase(headerData.languageLinks,'active',true).name}}. >> /P 12 0 R /K 0 2022 California Rules of Court. << >> >> 133 0 obj /P 529 0 R /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /S /P << /Lang (EN-US) 187 0 R 188 0 R 189 0 R 190 0 R 191 0 R 192 0 R 193 0 R 194 0 R 195 0 R 196 0 R /P 12 0 R /S /P gov%2Fdoc1%2F031119586589 &label=Case+Filing. >> 336 0 obj endobj Tenorio moves to supplement his Response to the Department's Motion for Summary Judgment with two cases: Jordan v. endobj << 233 0 obj <> endobj /K [327 0 R 328 0 R] 265 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) << /Pg 33 0 R Increasingly, courts nationwide have recognized and accepted timely, effective ethics screens as a positive factor for permitting an attorney to continue the representation, although sometimes a screen is not enough to avoid the ramifications of an imputed conflict. 321 0 obj /S /P >> /P 531 0 R << >> endobj /P 528 0 R /Annots [] /P 12 0 R /S /P An oral motion on the record, by an attorney of record, IS a formal motion, even if not accepted and demanded by the court to be submitted in writing. /K 5 /P 506 0 R 224 0 obj >> /Annots [] /K 17 /K 31 endobj /S /P >> /K 11 /P 12 0 R /S /P /K 47 /Lang (EN-US) endobj /Tabs /S >> /Lang (EN-US) /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /Lang (EN-US) /Lang (EN-US) /P 56 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /Lang (EN-US) << endobj /Pg 16 0 R /S /P /P 302 0 R >> endobj /P 12 0 R endobj /K 2 endobj 202 0 R] >> endobj Ct., 704 P.2d 851, 853 (Colo. 1985)). 35 [192 0 R 193 0 R 194 0 R 195 0 R 196 0 R 197 0 R 198 0 R 199 0 R 200 0 R 201 0 R /P 531 0 R endobj /P 508 0 R << << 215 0 obj superceded, 764 F.2d 548 (9th Cir. /P 508 0 R /Contents [479 0 R 480 0 R 481 0 R] /K 13 /StructParents 19 << /S /P /S /Link /Pg 19 0 R /Parent 11 0 R As the Colorado Supreme Court has noted, [v]iolation of an ethical rule, in itself, is neither a necessary nor a sufficient condition for disqualification, although there typically must be evidence of a violation or potential violation of attorney ethical proscriptions, such as those centered on the duties of loyalty and fairness or those intended to protect the integrity of the process.8 Often, motions to disqualify turn on the risk that a clients former attorney or law firm might be able to use against the client the confidences or secrets gained during the prior representation. >> /P 12 0 R /Lang (EN-US) >> 1. endobj endobj /K [38 293 0 R 40] 6 313 0 R 7 314 0 R 8 [84 0 R 85 0 R 86 0 R] /P 12 0 R << >> /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /P 12 0 R /S /P /Lang (EN-US) /Pg 20 0 R Disqualification motions implicate the most important duties that an attorney owes a client: the duties of confidentiality and loyalty. position as district attorney. /P 505 0 R /Lang (EN-US) 102 0 obj /Parent 10 0 R >> >> Motions to disqualify counsel are orchestrated for two primary reasons: Either an attorney or law firm have been unduly abusive or they have been so effective in defending or prosecuting a case. /Pg 15 0 R 1. /Lang (EN-US) /S /P endobj /S /P /P 529 0 R endobj /K 331 0 R (quoting People ex rel. 5 [73 0 R 74 0 R 75 0 R 76 0 R 77 0 R 78 0 R 79 0 R 80 0 R 313 0 R 80 0 R 209 0 R 210 0 R 211 0 R 212 0 R 213 0 R 214 0 R 215 0 R 216 0 R 217 0 R 218 0 R 317 0 obj /Annots [] Terre Du Lac Property Owners' Ass'n, Inc. v. Shrum, 661 S.W.2d 45, 48 (Mo. /Lang (EN-US) >> 292 0 obj /Annots [] >> /P 12 0 R >> endobj /S /P endobj 32 [180 0 R 181 0 R 182 0 R 183 0 R] >> endobj /P 286 0 R /Lang (EN-US) 17, 2020), the Central District of California decided a motion to disqualify brought by the defendant based on two grounds: (1) a purported conflict based on plaintiff's counsel's prior employment by the defendant; and (2) plaintiff's counsel's improper receipt of information, procured << /P 530 0 R /S /P /S /Table Case 2:19-cv-11661-DPH-DRG ECF No. /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /Pg 20 0 R 331 0 obj /Pg 46 0 R /Lang (EN-US) Motions to disqualify are far from rare occurrences. 274 0 obj /S /H3 /Parent 10 0 R endobj << /P 505 0 R endobj /S /P /Lang (EN-US) endobj /K [315 0 R 317 0 R 318 0 R] 201 0 obj /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /K 0 UNITED STATES' RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISQUALIFY PROSECUTORS MARK R. ROSMAN AND KAREN J. /K [6 277 0 R 8] /S /P /Pg 37 0 R /Pg 44 0 R endobj endobj Further, we cannot advise the asker as to what to do during an upcoming appearance in court. << /Outline /Span endobj endobj /P 123 0 R /K 3 endobj << >> /Contents [475 0 R 476 0 R 477 0 R] /PageLayout /OneColumn endobj /Lang (EN-US) 11. 1. /P 12 0 R 248 0 obj endobj endobj Attorney General . /K 19 270 0 obj << >> /K 2 /Lang (EN-US) On the contrary, a defendant must demonstrate a compelling and legitimate need to do so. /CropBox [0 0 612 792] 77 0 obj endobj /P 123 0 R Attorneys should be aware, however, that clients can make a successful case for disqualifying attorneys who had a greatly invested role with the organizational client or where the playbook knowledge is uniquely and particularly relevant to the new representation. /S /H3 << << /Contents [459 0 R 460 0 R 461 0 R] endobj << /P 12 0 R /P 12 0 R /Resources 440 0 R /Count 32 >> /StructParents 29 /Lang (EN-US) endobj /K 17 >> << /Rotate 0 /S /P >> /dc43kgm@9{Q CF";dlx23H(k)+BH0s0~SxDmSKfy~x|}w"l'%%o2nrQr>VKwLB3=_KJgZ%'$(":xPU.m99(+'&{Mj4k%'5CS@w7)05eX G?A*hR'*X\r^nDb'OAWMRd.ZEOp:|ECldHP?=[U'UjdW'f}\&D]J}r). endobj /Pages 3 0 R /P 12 0 R /P 12 0 R /Type /Page /Lang (EN-US) << endobj /K 5 /Pg 35 0 R The facts stated in Mrs. Landes' Response to the Motion to Disqualify, are true and correct, including the fact that I do not have Mr. Cuzdey's client file. >> /P 12 0 R Rule 2.330 (e). >> /P 12 0 R /Lang (EN-US) endstream endobj startxref /P 12 0 R /S /P >> 131 0 obj /CropBox [0 0 612 792] endobj 170 0 obj 4. His argument is self-defeating. /Pg 15 0 R >> /StructParents 14 << 184 0 obj /Count 5 /P 12 0 R 78 0 obj endobj /P 508 0 R << /K 1 /K 0 /S /Link /S /P << 126 0 obj endobj /S /TOCI endobj << 11. /A 520 0 R endobj 153 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) As with the substantial relationship test, whether an attorneys playbook knowledge is sufficient for disqualification is heavily dependent on the facts. filed a motion to disqualify the judge under CCP 170.1 [challenge of trial judge for cause] based on purported bias that the judge demonstrated during the first. /Lang (EN-US) 257 0 obj endobj endobj 305 0 obj /Pg 27 0 R Indeed, even if the attorney does not possess any direct information regarding the present lawsuit or transaction, the client may say that the attorney understands how the client thinks and acts. >> 27 [165 0 R 166 0 R 167 0 R 168 0 R null 331 0 R null] 0000001860 00000 n Attorneys understandably may feel apprehensive about the threat of a motion to disqualify, given the potential risk and loss of work. /Pg 23 0 R /Lang (EN-US) 26 0 obj /S /P /P 308 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /P 508 0 R Sharp was sent via Federal Express this day of June, 1997, to: J. /P 12 0 R << /K 3 /P 12 0 R Smithj46@michigan.gov / PLAINTIFF CATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST MICHIGAN'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISQUALIFY . Defendant's Motion at 1-3. /P 505 0 R /S /TOCI /K 7 237 0 obj /P 506 0 R /Pg 24 0 R /K 0 /P 531 0 R Disqualification must be complete and a judge cannot partially disqualify or recuse themselves. . Co. v. Isham, 782 F.Supp. /Lang (EN-US) 602. endobj 61 0 obj >> Rule 4-1.6 provides that, except in limited circumstances, "a lawyer shall not reveal information relating to representation of a client. << /S /P /Lang (EN-US) /S /P /P 163 0 R <<329FC6C22BACB2110A0030BBE330FF7F>]/Prev 482690>> >> /Lang (EN-US) The trial court heard oral argument on the motion, and on August 9, /K 2 288 0 obj << /Lang (EN-US) << /K 3 124 0 obj /P 529 0 R /Pg 17 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /Tabs /S 179 0 obj /Pg 19 0 R Ins. /P 508 0 R /P 509 0 R << endobj /Pg 38 0 R 0000003370 00000 n Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. endobj /Rotate 0 /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /Type /Page /P 12 0 R << << /Pg 15 0 R /S /P 346 0 obj 3 0 obj /StructParents 26 /Pg 28 0 R /S /Reference Because there are other witnesses available to testify, there is no compelling need to put the prosecuting attorneys on the stand to testify. /Pg 16 0 R /S /H3 /S /TOCI /K 0 endobj /StructParents 11 >> 157 0 R 158 0 R 159 0 R 160 0 R 161 0 R 162 0 R 163 0 R 164 0 R 165 0 R 166 0 R /Resources 474 0 R /P 133 0 R /A 517 0 R /K 6 << /Lang (EN-US) /Lang (EN-US) /P 506 0 R /P 12 0 R 1 /. << /Tabs /S >> /S /Link << /Count 5 154 0 obj /P 12 0 R /CropBox [0 0 612 792] >> >> /S /P /P 12 0 R /S /P 128 0 obj /Parent 7 0 R /Pg 45 0 R /S /P endobj << /Lang (EN-US) 318 0 obj /Pg 30 0 R /Parent 6 0 R << /Contents [445 0 R 446 0 R 447 0 R] >> At that point, the attorney is put in the awkward position of either explaining to the client why he or she should pay more money to keep the attorney, or absorbing the fees associated with defending the motion to disqualify. /Lang (EN-US) 62 0 obj endobj << /Lang (EN-US) 140 0 obj The far more common motion to disqualify involves a former client, either of the law firm or of an individual attorney (who may have recently joined the firm). >> >> endobj 107 0 obj /Pg 22 0 R /Pg 37 0 R Second, take effective steps to mitigate, if not eliminate, risks that a former clients confidences and secrets might be accessible to attorneys working on a matter involving the former client. /Rotate 0 >> 272 0 obj 226 0 obj /Type /Page /Pg 22 0 R /S /P /S /P >> /Lang (EN-US) 266 0 obj /S /P /Contents [467 0 R 468 0 R 469 0 R] 371 FILED 6/23/97. >> /Lang (EN-US) /P 12 0 R /Pg 29 0 R /Contents [463 0 R 464 0 R 465 0 R] 90 0 obj >> << /P 12 0 R endobj /Pg 19 0 R /Pg 20 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /P 55 0 R /K [30 289 0 R 32] /Tabs /S >> /StructParents 0 /K [16 518 0 R] << >> /K 41 /Type /Page Dec. 18, 2014) (denying motion for summary judgment on issue of whether Hunton & Williams should be disqualified in underlying arbitration), assets.law360news.com/ 0580000/580691/Memorandum%20and%20Order.pdf; Defendant and Counterclaimant Tate & Lyle Ingredients Americas LLCs Notice of Motion and Motion to Disqualify Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof, Western Sugar Coop. /K 14 64 0 obj << . /S /P This website and its publications are not designed to provide legal or other advice and you should not take, or refrain from taking, action based on its content. << >> /Lang (EN-US) << /K 3 /P 12 0 R << Two Special Agents from the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Frank Eldredge and James Hawkins, were present during the entirety of the meeting between the defendant and the prosecutors and are available to testify to the events in question. /S /P << << endobj endobj Id. /P 56 0 R /Lang (EN-US) 314 0 obj 235 0 obj 355 0 obj /P 505 0 R /Pg 17 0 R >> /P 12 0 R /Pg 17 0 R /K 11 endobj Mar. 120 0 obj ), op. /S /TOCI 145 0 obj >> /Lang (EN-US) /Pg 17 0 R In the motion, Petitioner alleged he was . >> /Pg 17 0 R /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /Pg 19 0 R endobj << /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /Lang (EN-US) gdYBC;:::@Jht Mkhml$Y*$&\@$#m ` D*e d!$4RLd` /Lang (EN-US) /Pg 19 0 R 177 0 R 178 0 R 179 0 R 180 0 R 181 0 R 182 0 R 183 0 R 184 0 R 185 0 R 186 0 R >> /P 508 0 R /P 12 0 R >> >> >> /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /Lang (EN-US) /Lang (EN-US) /Pg 44 0 R /Pg 16 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /K 0 disqualify the plaintiff's attorney in a suit in which the attor-ney's former 6client was not a party. endobj /Lang (EN-US) endobj /S /P /K 33 endobj /Pg 18 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /S /P /K 14 /S /P endobj endobj /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] Lansing, MI 48909 (517) 335 -7603 . << /Annots [] A motion to disqualify shall be . >> << >> << /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /Pg 17 0 R >> /Pg 37 0 R /K 18 68 0 obj /S /P >> /Contents [495 0 R 496 0 R 497 0 R] >> U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, ANTITRUST DIVISION 450 Golden Gate Avenue, Rm. >> As noted, this order addresses . /Filter /FlateDecode << << endobj << << 318 0 R null 319 0 R 123 0 R 320 0 R 123 0 R 321 0 R 123 0 R] /Pg 30 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /K [2 275 0 R 4] << 330 0 obj A motion is usually made in writing. /Lang /Lang (EN-US) endobj /Lang (EN-US) >> 108 0 obj /S /P RESPONSE to Motion re 31 MOTION to Disqualify Counsel filed by Xcentric Ventures, LLC for Xcentric Ventures, LLC et al v. Stanley et al :: Justia Dockets & Filings Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit Arizona District Court Xcentric Ventures, LLC et al v. Stanley et al Filing 39 Xcentric Ventures, LLC et al v. Stanley et al Filing 39 /S /Table endobj /S /P << /Pg 22 0 R endobj /Lang (EN-US) 0000002415 00000 n /StructParents 13 /P 531 0 R /Lang (EN-US) motion to disqualify for a hearing. 87 0 obj 291 0 obj endobj /P 12 0 R >> Because motions to disqualify seek to deprive the opposing /Lang (EN-US) /P 55 0 R Rule 1.432 requires that a motion to disqualify be made within a reasonable time after discovering the facts upon which the motion is based. endobj /P 508 0 R RESPONSE to Motion re 31 MOTION to Disqualify Counsel filed by Xcentric Ventures, LLC(an Arizona Corporation), Ed Magedson(an individual). 85 0 obj << /Pg 15 0 R endobj /S /P 75 0 obj endobj /Lang (EN-US) the entire judicial process' when deciding a motion to disqualify an attorney pursuant to K.R.P.C. << /K 2 /Chart /Figure << In recent months, a number of high-profile disqualification motions have been reported.1 Many disqualification motions are well-founded. << endobj /P 531 0 R << 264 0 obj Significantly, the increasing mobility of lateral attorneys (with attorneys rarely spending their entire legal careers at a single law practice or firm) has raised issues that can serve as the basis of a motion to disqualify. When faced with a motion to disqualify, the first course of action is typically to notify the client. /Pg 29 0 R Dec. 10, 2014) (order disqualifying Jones Day), assets.law360news.com/ 0606000/606910/Celgard-LGC%20Order%20disqualifying%20 Jones%20Day.pdf. /Annots [423 0 R 424 0 R] /S /P 304 0 obj << >> << /P 506 0 R /Resources 387 0 R >> /Tabs /S /Pg 17 0 R /S /P << /Pg 44 0 R /P 12 0 R endobj /S /P /S /P 167 0 obj << /Parent 3 0 R >> endobj /S /P /Lang (EN-US) 94 0 obj /Kids [30 0 R 31 0 R 32 0 R 33 0 R 34 0 R] By far the majority of successful motions to disqualify are brought on the basis of a conflict of interest with a former or concurrent client or imputation, but attorneys should also be aware that successful motions to disqualify have been brought on the following bases, among others: (1) lawyer as witness, (2) appearance of impropriety, (3) receipt of confidential data, (4) personal interest, (5) violation of the no contact rules, and (6) misconduct with a witness.
2022 Chevy 2500 Stock Front Bumper,
Benefits Hcr Manorcare Login,
Schoology Fbisd Login,
Thompson Middle School Honor Roll,
Articles R
response to motion to disqualify attorneyLeave A Reply